(PC) Bowers v. El Dorado County Jail

Opinion

COLIN GREGORY BOWERS, No. 2:21-cv-0520 DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS EL DORADO COUNTY JAIL, et al., Defendants. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order dated November 2, 2021, the court dismissed plaintiff’s complaint and ordered plaintiff to file a first amended complaint within thirty days of the date of that order. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was warned that failure to abide by the court’s order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. (Id. at 8.) Thirty days have passed. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, requested an extension of time, updated his address, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, the court will recommend that this action be dismissed for failure to prosecute and failure to comply with court orders. //// //// //// //// For the reasons state above, the Clerk of the Court is ORDERED to randomly assign a district judge to this action. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within twenty-one days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. Yist, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: February 23, 2022

.B ORAH BARNES UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE DDE Prisoner Inbox/Civil Rights/R/bowe0520.fr_dism