(PC) Barra v. Boudreaux

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 31, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-00966·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

11 ANTHONY LAWRENCE BARRA, ) Case No.: 1:24-cv-0966 JLT BAM ) 12 Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS ) AND RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING THE 13 v. ) ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, ) AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO 14 BOUDREAUX, et al., ) CLOSE THE CASE ) 15 Defendants. ) (Doc. 10) ) 16

17 Anthony Lawrence Barra seeks to hold the defendants liable for violations of his civil rights 18 while a pretrial detainee housed at the Bob Wiley Detention Facility in Visalia, California. (See 19 generally Doc. 8.) The magistrate judge screened Plaintiff’s amended complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 20 § 1915A(a) and found he failed to state a cognizable claim. (Doc. 10 at 3-6.) Because Plaintiff failed 21 to cure the pleading deficiencies after the Court provided the applicable legal standards, the magistrate 22 judge found further leave to amend was not warranted. (Id. at 6.) Therefore, the magistrate judge 23 recommended the Court dismiss the action. (Id.) 24 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any 25 objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 10 at 6.) The Court advised him that the “failure to file 26 objections within the specified time may result in the waiver of the ‘right to challenge the magistrate’s 27 factual findings’ on appeal.” (Id. at 7, quoting Wilkerson v. Wheeler, 772 F.3d 834, 838-39 (9th Cir. 28 2014).) Plaintiff did not file objections, and the time to do so has passed. 1 According to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), this Court performed a de novo review of this case. Havi 2 || carefully reviewed the matter, the Court concludes the Findings and Recommendations are supported 3 || by the record and proper analysis. Thus, the Court ORDERS: 4 1. The Findings and Recommendations dated February 27, 2025 (Doc. 10) are 5 ADOPTED in full. 6 2. The action is DISMISSED for failure to state a claim. 7 3. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 8 9 IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: _March 30, 2025 Cerin | Tower 11 TED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Barra v. Boudreaux, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Barra v. Boudreaux ((PC) Barra v. Boudreaux) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

J. Wilkerson v. B. Wheeler
772 F.3d 834 (Ninth Circuit, 2014)