(PC) Bailey v. Cox
Opinion
° UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA TIMOTHY BAILEY, Case No. 1:22-cv-00757-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE A v. RESPONSIVE PLEADING T. COX, et al., (ECF No. 25) Defendants. Plaintiff Timothy Bailey is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). On March 23, 2023, Defendants, by way of special appearance, filed a request to extend the time to file a responsive pleading to allow the United States to arrange for representation and the filing of a response. Good cause having been presented, it is HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants are granted sixty (60) days from the date of service of this order to file a response to the operative complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. F- 2 ee 95 Dated: _ March 27, 2023 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Bailey v. Cox ((PC) Bailey v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.