(PC) Baggett v. Division of Adult Parole Corrections and Rehabilitation

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. California
DecidedAugust 21, 2024
Docket1:24-cv-00978
StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Baggett v. Division of Adult Parole Corrections and Rehabilitation ((PC) Baggett v. Division of Adult Parole Corrections and Rehabilitation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
(PC) Baggett v. Division of Adult Parole Corrections and Rehabilitation, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 8 ANTHONY A. BAGGETT, 1:24-cv-00978-GSA (PC) 9 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SUBMIT A 10 v. NON-PRISONER APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 11 DIVISION OF ADULT PAROLE OR PAY THE $405.00 FILING FEE CORRECTIONS AND WITHIN THIRTY DAYS 12 REHABILITATION, 13 Defendant. 14 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 15 §1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 16 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 17 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 18 Plaintiff has not paid the $405.00 filing fee, or submitted an application to proceed in 19 forma pauperis on the appropriate form pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Accordingly, IT IS 20 HEREBY ORDERED that: 21 1. The Clerk’s Office shall send to plaintiff the attached form for application to 22 proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner; 23 2. Within thirty days of the date of service of this order, plaintiff shall submit the 24 completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis for a non-prisoner, or in the 25 alternative, pay the $405.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to comply with this order will 26 result in dismissal of this action. 27 Dated: August 21, 2024 /s/ Gary S. Austin 1 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Page v. Torrey
201 F.3d 1136 (Ninth Circuit, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
(PC) Baggett v. Division of Adult Parole Corrections and Rehabilitation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-baggett-v-division-of-adult-parole-corrections-and-rehabilitation-caed-2024.