(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 13, 2023·No. 2:20-cv-00246·Unknown

Opinion

Wayne S. Calhoon, No. 2:20-cv-0246-KJM-JDP Plaintiff, ORDER v. Motel 6 Operating L.P. et al., Defendants. On June 21, 2021, this court related the present case to case 19-cv-02165, Calhoon v. City of South Lake Tahoe Police Dept. et al. under Local Rule 123. E.D. Cal. L.R. 123(a)(3). Litigation has been ongoing in the related case, but plaintiffs have taken no action in the present case since April 19, 2021. See Decl., ECF No. 7. Thus, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 (9th Cir. 1998) (citing Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986)). IT IS SO ORDERED. , / DATED: March 13, 2023. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen ((PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hernandez v. City of El Monte
138 F.3d 393 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)
Henderson v. Duncan
779 F.2d 1421 (Ninth Circuit, 1986)