(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen

E.D. California

(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen

DecidedMarch 13, 2023

Docket2:20-cv-00246

StatusUnknown

This text of (PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen ((PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen, (E.D. Cal. 2023).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 | Wayne S. Calhoon, No. 2:20-cv-0246-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 6 Motel 6 Operating L.P. et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 On June 21, 2021, this court related the present case to case 19-cv-02165, Calhoon v. City 21 | of South Lake Tahoe Police Dept. et al. under Local Rule 123. E.D. Cal. L.R. 123(a)(3). 22 | Litigation has been ongoing in the related case, but plaintiffs have taken no action in the present 23 | case since April 19, 2021. See Decl., ECF No. 7. Thus, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause 24 | within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution under 25 | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 26 | (9th Cir. 1998) (citing Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986)). 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. , / 28 DATED: March 13, 2023. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 11 | Wayne S. Calhoon, No. 2:20-cv-0246-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 15 6 Motel 6 Operating L.P. et al., Defendants. 18 19 20 On June 21, 2021, this court related the present case to case 19-cv-02165, Calhoon v. City 21 | of South Lake Tahoe Police Dept. et al. under Local Rule 123. E.D. Cal. L.R. 123(a)(3). 22 | Litigation has been ongoing in the related case, but plaintiffs have taken no action in the present 23 | case since April 19, 2021. See Decl., ECF No. 7. Thus, plaintiffs are ordered to show cause 24 | within fourteen days why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution under 25 | Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b). See Hernandez v. City of El Monte, 138 F.3d 393, 399 26 | (9th Cir. 1998) (citing Henderson v. Duncan, 779 F.2d 1421 (9th Cir. 1986)). 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. , / 28 DATED: March 13, 2023. CHIEF ED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

(PC) Anderson v. Vangerwen, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-anderson-v-vangerwen-caed-2023.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack