(PC) Anderson v. Babcock
Opinion
TERRANCE ANDERSON, No. 2:23-cv-2779 TLN AC P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS C. BABCOCK, et al., Defendants. By order filed May 29, 2024, plaintiff was ordered to file a signed complaint within thirty days. Plaintiff was warned that his failure to comply would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day deadline has long since passed, and plaintiff has not filed a signed complaint to properly commence this action, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that //// failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). DATED: December 18, 2024 ~ ththten— Llane ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
(PC) Anderson v. Babcock ((PC) Anderson v. Babcock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.