(PC) Alvarez v. McKean

Opinion

MIGUEL A. ALVAREZ, No. 2:24-cv-2062 CKD P Plaintiff, v. Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS On September 25, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. In that order, plaintiff was warned that failure to file an amended complaint would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on October 25, 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court assign a district court judge to this case. IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991). Dated: 11/08/24 Card ft 4 by ae CAROLYN K DELANEY? UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9} 1 alva2062.fta 1]