(PC) Allen v. Her

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 9, 2025·No. 2:24-cv-01643·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 11 ROY C. ALLEN, No. 2:24-cv-1643 WBS CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 HER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On March 30, 2025, the court ordered plaintiff to return to the court documents necessary 18 for service of process on defendants. Plaintiff was warned that failure to comply with the court’s 19 order would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The deadline for 20 compliance with the court’s order has expired and, despite an extension, plaintiff has not returned 21 all of the required documents. 22 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without 23 prejudice. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 24 These findings and recommendations will be submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 27 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Findings and 28 Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time 1 || may waive the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 2 | Cir. 1991). 3 | Dated: July 9, 2025 Card ft | / L , — 5 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 6 7 8 fi 9 alle1643.fusm

10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Allen v. Her, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Allen v. Her ((PC) Allen v. Her) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related