(PC) Allen v. Clendenin
This text of (PC) Allen v. Clendenin ((PC) Allen v. Clendenin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 9 DAVID ALLEN, 1:23-cv-00921-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S 11 v. APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS 12 | STEPHANIE CLENDENIN, et al., (ECF No. 2). 13 Defendants. 14 5 Plaintiff is a civil detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Individuals detained pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code § 6600 et seq. 16 are civil detainees and are not prisoners within the meaning of the Prison Litigation Reform Act. 17 Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000). 18 On June 20, 2023, Plaintiff submitted an application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF 19 No. 2). Examination of Plaintiff's application reveals that Plaintiff is unable to afford the costs of 20 this action. Accordingly, Plaintiffs application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 2) is 21 | GRANTED. 92 | IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 : : Dated: _ June 21, 2023 [sf hey □□ 24 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
(PC) Allen v. Clendenin, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pc-allen-v-clendenin-caed-2023.