(PC) Alexander v. Guillen

District Court, E.D. California·Decided July 7, 2025·No. 1:24-cv-01341·Unknown

Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JULIAN J. ALEXANDER, Case No. 1:24-cv-01341-KES-EPG (PC) 8 Plaintiff, SCHEDULING ORDER

9 Exhaustion Motions: September 29, 2025 10 v. Doe Identification: January 2, 2026 11

12 FOSTER, et al., Motions to Compel: February 3, 2026

13 Defendants. Non-expert Discovery: March 3, 2026 14

15 Dispositive Motions: April 3, 2026 16

17 This Court now sets a schedule for this action through the filing of dispositive motions. 18 I. DISCOVERY PROCEDURES 19 Discovery is now open, and the parties are granted leave to serve discovery requests. 20 Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26–36, discovery shall proceed as 21 follows: 22 1. The parties may take the following types of discovery from other parties: 23 a. Interrogatories (an interrogatory is a written question or request for 24 information and “may relate to any matter that may be inquired into under 25 Rule 26(b).” Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(a)(2)); 26 b. Requests for Production (a request for production is a written request that the 27 opposing party produce documents or electronically stored information, 28 1 “including writings, drawings, graphs, charts, photographs, sound 2 recordings, images, and other data or data compilations,” or a written request 3 that the opposing party produce any designated tangible things. Fed. R. Civ. 4 P. 34(a)(1)); c. Requests for Admissions (a request for admission is a written request that 5 the opposing party “admit, for purposes of the pending action only, the truth 6 of any matters within the scope of Rule 26(b)(1)” that relate to “(A) facts, 7 the application of law to fact, or opinions about either; [or] (B) the 8 genuineness of any described documents.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 36(a)(1)); and 9 d. Depositions (a deposition is where one party (or that party’s counsel) 10 questions someone under oath, and a court reporter is present to record 11 the proceedings). 12 1. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), 13 Defendant(s) may depose any witness confined in a prison on 14 the condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a 15 deposition, Defendant(s) serve all parties with the notice required 16 by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Plaintiff’s failure to 17 participate in a properly noticed deposition could result in sanctions 18 against Plaintiff, including monetary sanctions and/or dismissal of 19 this case. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), 20 the parties may take any deposition under this section by video 21 conference without a further motion or order of the Court, relieving 22 the court reporter of the requirement to be in the physical presence 23 of the witness under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 28(a)(1) during that deposition. 24 2. If Plaintiff wishes to take a deposition, Plaintiff must file a motion 25 requesting the Court’s permission to do so. Before filing a motion, 26 Plaintiff must contract with a licensed court reporter, also known as 27 Certified Shorthand Reporters (CSRs). CSRs are not court 28 1 employees; they are private individuals. Plaintiff is responsible for 2 paying CSRs their fees for taking the deposition and producing 3 a transcript. Plaintiff’s pro se or in forma pauperis status does not 4 entitle Plaintiff to a free deposition. Every motion for leave to take deposition must include the name of the person to be deposed, 5 the name and contact information for the court reporter with whom 6 Plaintiff contracted, the estimated cost for the CSR’s time and the 7 recording, and the source of funds for payment of that cost, or the 8 motion may be summarily denied for failure to comply with this 9 order. The Court may request input from Plaintiff’s institution of 10 confinement to determine if the deposition(s) can proceed in a safe 11 and secure manner before ruling on a motion for a deposition. 12 2. A party may serve on any other party no more than 15 interrogatories, 15 requests for 13 production of documents, and 15 requests for admission. If a party wishes to serve 14 additional discovery requests, that party may file a motion for additional discovery 15 requests with the Court, explaining why additional discovery requests are necessary. 16 3. Discovery requests and responses should be sent to the opposing part(ies), or their 17 counsel if represented. They should not be filed with the Court. 18 4. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the 19 request is first served. This means that written discovery requests must be served 20 within a timeframe that allows the opposing party a forty-five (45) day period to 21 respond prior to the close of non-expert discovery. Any party who is served a request 22 where the forty-five (45) day period for response would end after the close of non- 23 expert discovery is entitled to object to that request on the ground that the request is untimely. 24 5. Boilerplate objections are disfavored and may be summarily overruled by the Court. 25 Responses to document requests shall include all documents within a party’s 26 possession, custody, or control. Fed. R. Civ. P. 34(a)(1). Documents are deemed to be 27 within a party’s possession, custody, or control if the party has actual possession, 28 1 custody, or control thereof, or the legal right to obtain the property on demand. If 2 Defendant(s) cannot obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement, 3 Defendant(s) shall clearly respond that a third-party subpoena will be necessary to 4 obtain documents from Plaintiff’s institution(s) of confinement. 6. If any party or third party withholds a document on the basis of privilege, that party or 5 third party shall provide a privilege log to the requesting party identifying the date, 6 author, recipients, general subject matter, and basis of the privilege within thirty days 7 after the date that responses are due. Failure to provide a privilege log within this time 8 shall result in a waiver of the privilege. Additionally, if a party is claiming a right to 9 withhold witness statements and/or evidence gathered from investigation(s) into the 10 incident(s) at issue in the complaint based on the official information privilege or 11 confidentiality, the withholding party shall submit the withheld witness statements 12 and/or evidence to the Court for in camera review, along with an explanation of why 13 the witness statements and/or evidence should be withheld.1 The witness statements 14 and/or evidence shall be Bates stamped and emailed to 15 EPGorders@caed.uscourts.gov. The withholding party shall also file and serve a 16 17 1 See Woodford v. Ngo, 548 U.S. 81, 94–95 (2006) (“[P]roper exhaustion improves the quality of 18 those prisoner suits that are eventually filed because proper exhaustion often results in the creation of an 19 administrative record that is helpful to the court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

(PC) Alexander v. Guillen, (E.D. Cal. 2025).

(PC) Alexander v. Guillen ((PC) Alexander v. Guillen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related