(PC) Adair v. Vue

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES FRANKLIN ADAIR, No. 2:24-cv-0915 CKD P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. 14 MACNAUGHT, et al., ORDER AND 15 Defendants. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 17 On September 3, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff 18 was warned that failure to file an amended complaint within 30 days would result in a 19 recommendation that this action be dismissed. The amended complaint was due on October 5, 20 2024, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. 21 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk shall assign a district judge to 22 this action; and 23 IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See 24 Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). 25 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 26 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 27 after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections 28 with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 1 | and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified 2 || time waives the right to appeal the District Court’s order. Martinez v. YIst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th 3 || Cir. 1991). 4 | Dated: October 16, 2024 Card ke yy a 5 CAROLYN K DELANEY? 6 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 7 8 9} 1 10 adai09 15.fta

1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28