P.B. v. State of Florida
This text of P.B. v. State of Florida (P.B. v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
P.B., Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2025-0118
[October 22, 2025]
Appeal from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Charles E. Burton, Judge; L.T. Case No. 502024MH002609.
Daniel Eisinger, Public Defender, and Narine N. Austin, Assistant Public Defender, West Palm Beach, for appellant.
James Uthmeier, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Jacqueline I. Kurland, Senior Assistant Attorney General, West Palm Beach, for appellee.
ON CONFESSION OF ERROR
PER CURIAM.
The appellant, P.B., challenges the circuit court’s order granting a petition for involuntary placement under section 394.467(2)(b), Florida Statutes (2024). P.B. argues the evidence presented below was insufficient to establish that: her refusal of medical treatment for an ongoing hypertensive health condition was caused by mental illness rather than a simple refusal to take medications; a substantial likelihood existed that she would inflict serious bodily harm on herself or others in the near future; or she would suffer from neglect without treatment and such neglect posed a real threat of substantial harm to her well-being.
The State concedes the evidence was insufficient to establish substantial neglect or a substantial likelihood that P.B. would harm herself or others. After reviewing the record, we accept the confession of error and reverse the involuntary placement order. See Singletary v. State, 765 So. 2d 180, 181 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000) (“The state has the burden to establish the criteria for involuntary placement set out in [section 394.467] by clear and convincing evidence. . . . The mere fact of mental illness is insufficient justification for involuntary commitment.”).
Reversed.
MAY, CIKLIN and KLINGENSMITH, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely-filed motion for rehearing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
P.B. v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pb-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.