PB-36 Doe v. Niagara Falls City Sch. Dist.

215 A.D.3d 1299, 186 N.Y.S.3d 783, 2023 NY Slip Op 02274
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in PB-36 Doe v. Niagara Falls City Sch. Dist.. Read the opinion of the Court — 182 N.Y.S.3d 850
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 28, 2023·No. MOTION NO. (1015/22) CA 21-01223.·Published

Opinion

PB-36 Doe v Niagara Falls City Sch. Dist. (2023 NY Slip Op 02274)
PB-36 Doe v Niagara Falls City Sch. Dist.
2023 NY Slip Op 02274
Decided on April 28, 2023
Appellate Division, Fourth Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 28, 2023
PRESENT: WHALEN, P.J.,
MOTION NO. (1015/22) CA 21-01223.

[*1]PB-36 DOE, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,

v

NIAGARA FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LASALLE JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL, DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS, AND ROBERT LEWIS, DEFENDANT. NEW YORK STATE OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL, INTERVENOR-RESPONDENT.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

Motion for reargument or leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals denied.

SMITH, LINDLEY, BANNISTER, AND MONTOUR, JJ. (Filed Apr. 28, 2023.)



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PB-36 Doe v. Niagara Falls City Sch. Dist., 215 A.D.3d 1299, 186 N.Y.S.3d 783, 2023 NY Slip Op 02274 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2023).

215 A.D.3d 1299 (PB-36 Doe v. Niagara Falls City Sch. Dist.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

§ 431
New York JUD § 431