Pazouhandeh v. Salgar Construction Co.

112 So. 3d 151, 2013 WL 1918890, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7503
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 2013·No. No. 5D10-470·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

COHEN, J.

Abbas Pazouhandeh appeals from a final judgment awarding attorney’s fees. That judgment appears to grant each side fees related to a suit involving construction of a home, then set off the fees. Pazouhandeh notes the lack of a record, stating he will “rely on memory of the testimony that transpired at trial to the best of his abilities.” This does not comply with Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.200(b)(4), and thus, we are unable to accept the facts as set forth in Pazouhandeh’s brief.

Pazouhandeh argues that the court improperly determined the prevailing party issue. Without a transcript of the hearing, our review is limited to errors appearing on the face of that judgment. See Maslow v. Edwards, 886 So.2d 1027, 1028 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004). As there are no such errors, we affirm.

AFFIRMED.

GRIFFIN and SAWAYA, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pazouhandeh v. Salgar Construction Co., 112 So. 3d 151, 2013 WL 1918890, 2013 Fla. App. LEXIS 7503 (Fla. Ct. App. 2013).

112 So. 3d 151 (Pazouhandeh v. Salgar Construction Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Kesoki Painting LLC
260 So. 3d 550 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018)
Westchester Fire Ins. Co. v. Kesoki Painting
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2018