Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A. ex rel. Lehman XS Trust Mortgage

447 F. App'x 467
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJuly 29, 2011
DocketNo. 10-1739
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 447 F. App'x 467 (Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A. ex rel. Lehman XS Trust Mortgage) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A. ex rel. Lehman XS Trust Mortgage, 447 F. App'x 467 (4th Cir. 2011).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Liliana E. Pazmino appeals from the district court’s final judgment entered after the district court granted Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her claims against Defendants, including her state law claim for quiet title. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A., No. 1:09-cv-01173-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 30, 2010; entered July 1, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hien Pham v. Bank of New York
856 F. Supp. 2d 804 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
447 F. App'x 467, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pazmino-v-lasalle-bank-na-ex-rel-lehman-xs-trust-mortgage-ca4-2011.