Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A. ex rel. Lehman XS Trust Mortgage

447 F. App'x 467
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 29, 2011·No. No. 10-1739·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Liliana E. Pazmino appeals from the district court’s final judgment entered after the district court granted Defendants’ Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss her claims against Defendants, including her state law claim for quiet title. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. See Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A., No. 1:09-cv-01173-GBL-JFA (E.D. Va. filed June 30, 2010; entered July 1, 2010); see also Horvath v. Bank of N.Y., 641 F.3d 617 (4th Cir.2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A. ex rel. Lehman XS Trust Mortgage, 447 F. App'x 467 (4th Cir. 2011).

447 F. App'x 467 (Pazmino v. LaSalle Bank N.A. ex rel. Lehman XS Trust Mortgage) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hien Pham v. Bank of New York
856 F. Supp. 2d 804 (E.D. Virginia, 2012)