Pazera v. Pazera

581 A.2d 1056, 216 Conn. 819, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 381
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided October 4, 1990·Published

Opinion

The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Did the order of the trial court to sell the marital home constitute an arguable violation of a constitutional or statutory right of the plaintiff within the meaning of State v. Curdo, 191 Conn. 27?
“2. If not, should Curdo be expanded to recognize this order as a final judgment for purpose of appeal?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pazera v. Pazera, 581 A.2d 1056, 216 Conn. 819, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 381 (Colo. 1990).

581 A.2d 1056 (Pazera v. Pazera) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Curcio
463 A.2d 566 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)