Pazera v. Pazera
581 A.2d 1056, 216 Conn. 819, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 381
This text of 581 A.2d 1056 (Pazera v. Pazera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pazera v. Pazera, 581 A.2d 1056, 216 Conn. 819, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 381 (Colo. 1990).
Opinion
The plaintiff’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the order of the trial court to sell the marital home constitute an arguable violation of a constitutional or statutory right of the plaintiff within the meaning of State v. Curdo, 191 Conn. 27?
“2. If not, should Curdo be expanded to recognize this order as a final judgment for purpose of appeal?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Curcio
463 A.2d 566 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1983)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
581 A.2d 1056, 216 Conn. 819, 1990 Conn. LEXIS 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pazera-v-pazera-conn-1990.