Pazandeh v. Yamaha Corporation of America

Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided April 11, 2018·No. 18-1275·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________

April 11, 2018

ERRATA ______________________

Appeal No. 2018-1275

IRA PAZANDEH, Plaintiff-Appellant

v.

YAMAHA CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee

Decided: April 6, 2018 Nonprecedential Opinion ______________________

Please make the following changes: Page 3, lines 32 and 33, replace “emphasis” with “em- phases.” Page 4, line 5, omit “[JA 144-170].” Page 4, line 14, omit “[JA-82-91].” Page 5, line 15, replace “attorneys’” with “attorney.” Page 5, line 16, omit “[JA33].” 2 PAZANDEH v. YAMAHA CORPORATION OF AMERICA

Page 7, line 20, replace “’265 patent col.” with “’265 patent, col.” Page 8, line 33, after “J.A. 223-24” add “(emphasis added).” Page 11, line 3-4, replace “attorneys’” with “attorney.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pazandeh v. Yamaha Corporation of America, (Fed. Cir. 2018).

Pazandeh v. Yamaha Corporation of America (Pazandeh v. Yamaha Corporation of America) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.