Paz v. O'Brien
This text of Paz v. O'Brien (Paz v. O'Brien) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 10-7088
NICHOLAS PAZ,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TERRY O’BRIEN,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, Senior District Judge. (7:10-cv-00304-jlk-mfu)
Submitted: January 18, 2011 Decided: January 26, 2011
Before NIEMEYER, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Nicholas Paz, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Nicholas Paz, a federal prisoner, appeals the district
court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2241 (West
2006 & Supp. 2010) petition. We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. Paz v. O’Brien, No. 7:10-
cv-00304-jlk-mfu (W.D. Va. July 23, 2010). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Paz v. O'Brien, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paz-v-obrien-ca4-2011.