Payton, Keith Anthony v. State

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 13, 2002
Docket01-02-00409-CR
StatusPublished

This text of Payton, Keith Anthony v. State (Payton, Keith Anthony v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payton, Keith Anthony v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion





In The

Court of Appeals

For The

First District of Texas

____________



NOS. 01-02-00408-CR

01-02-00409-CR



KEITH ANTHONY PAYTON, Appellant



V.



THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee



On Appeal from the 183rd District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause Nos. 892058 and 898614



MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance and delivery of a controlled substance, and in accordance with a plea bargain agreement with the State, was sentenced to three years confinement in each case. Appellant filed timely notices of appeal. We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.

In both cases, appellant filed a notice of appeal that did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in that it did not state that the appeal was for a jurisdictional defect, that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant may not now file an amended notice of appeal to correct jurisdictional defects. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 413-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).

An appellate court is without jurisdiction in felony cases such as the present ones in which: (1) the defendant entered a plea of guilty or no contest based on a plea bargain agreement; (2) the trial court followed the agreement in assessing punishment; and (3) a non-compliant notice of appeal was filed. See White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 429 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).

We also note that appellant waived his right to appeal if the trial court followed the plea bargain agreement. See Buck v. State, 45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.).

Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.

PER CURIAM



Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Taft, and Smith. (1)

Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.

1.

The Honorable Jackson B. Smith, Jr., retired Justice, Court of Appeals, First District of Texas at Houston, participating by assignment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cooper v. State
45 S.W.3d 77 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
Buck v. State
45 S.W.3d 275 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2001)
White v. State
61 S.W.3d 424 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2001)
State v. Riewe
13 S.W.3d 408 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Payton, Keith Anthony v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payton-keith-anthony-v-state-texapp-2002.