Payton, Keith Anthony v. State
This text of Payton, Keith Anthony v. State (Payton, Keith Anthony v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
____________
NOS. 01-02-00408-CR
01-02-00409-CR
KEITH ANTHONY PAYTON, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the 183rd District Court
Harris County, Texas
Trial Court Cause Nos. 892058 and 898614
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant pleaded guilty to possession of a controlled substance and delivery of a controlled substance, and in accordance with a plea bargain agreement with the State, was sentenced to three years confinement in each case. Appellant filed timely notices of appeal. We dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
In both cases, appellant filed a notice of appeal that did not comply with the requirements of Rule 25.2(b)(3) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure in that it did not state that the appeal was for a jurisdictional defect, that the substance of the appeal was raised by written motion and ruled on before trial, or that the trial court granted permission to appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 25.2(b)(3). Appellant may not now file an amended notice of appeal to correct jurisdictional defects. State v. Riewe, 13 S.W.3d 408, 413-14 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000).
An appellate court is without jurisdiction in felony cases such as the present ones in which: (1) the defendant entered a plea of guilty or no contest based on a plea bargain agreement; (2) the trial court followed the agreement in assessing punishment; and (3) a non-compliant notice of appeal was filed. See White v. State, 61 S.W.3d 424, 429 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001); Cooper v. State, 45 S.W.3d 77, 83 (Tex. Crim. App. 2001).
We also note that appellant waived his right to appeal if the trial court followed the plea bargain agreement. See Buck v. State, 45 S.W.3d 275, 278 (Tex. App.--Houston [1st Dist.] 2001, no pet.).
Accordingly, we dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Justices Mirabal, Taft, and Smith. (1)
Do not publish. Tex. R. App. P. 47.
1.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Payton, Keith Anthony v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payton-keith-anthony-v-state-texapp-2002.