Payne v. Williams

Court of Chancery of South Carolina

Payne v. Williams

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 449

Court of Chancery of South Carolina·Decided January 30, 1752·Published

Opinion

Ordered That the Defendant Robert Williams do Rejoin to the Complainant’s Replication filed in this Cause in Eight days after Service of this Rule.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register in Chancery

The following Causes are set down to be heard on Thursday the 13th day of February next, appointed by Law for Solemn Hearings in this Court, vizt Leggatt et uxr and Gorwood, Executrix of Anne Graves, vs. Thomas Lam-boll, Surviving Executor of Andrew Allen, who was Surviving Executor of Cawood, (Rutledge for the Complainants, Pinckney for the Defendant); Thomas Lamboll, Surviving Executor of Andrew Allen, vs. John Scott, Executor of John Allen, deceased, (Pinckney for the Complainant, Rutledge pro Defendant).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ordered That the Defendant Robert Williams do Rejoin to the Complainant’s Replication filed in this Cause in Eight days after Service of this Rule.

Alexr Stewart Deputy Register in Chancery

The following Causes are set down to be heard on Thursday the 13th day of February next, appointed by Law for Solemn Hearings in this Court, vizt Leggatt et uxr and Gorwood, Executrix of Anne Graves, vs. Thomas Lam-boll, Surviving Executor of Andrew Allen, who was Surviving Executor of Cawood, (Rutledge for the Complainants, Pinckney for the Defendant); Thomas Lamboll, Surviving Executor of Andrew Allen, vs. John Scott, Executor of John Allen, deceased, (Pinckney for the Complainant, Rutledge pro Defendant).

Payne v. Williams, 6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 449 (Conn. Super. Ct. 1752).

Pincite

6 Rec. Co. Ch. (S.C.) 449 (Payne v. Williams) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.