Payne v. Weinstein
This text of 252 A.D. 782 (Payne v. Weinstein) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial on the ground
of newly-discovered evidence and surprise reversed on the law and the facts, with costs, and motion granted. We are of opinion that, upon the record of the trial and the additional proof submitted by affidavits, justice requires that a new trial be granted. Hagarty, Carswell, Davis and Taylor, JJ., concur; Adel, J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
252 A.D. 782, 300 N.Y.S. 705, 1937 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6278, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-weinstein-nyappdiv-1937.