Payne v. Wal-Mart

963 So. 2d 308, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12628, 2007 WL 2301284
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 14, 2007
DocketNo. 1D06-4824
StatusPublished

This text of 963 So. 2d 308 (Payne v. Wal-Mart) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. Wal-Mart, 963 So. 2d 308, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12628, 2007 WL 2301284 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We AFFIRM the JCC’s order on trial attorney’s fees and costs and DENY the motion for appellate attorney’s fees. Buitrago v. Landry’s, 949 So.2d 1046 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006); Lundy v. Four Seasons Ocean Grand Palm, Beach, 932 So.2d 506 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006), review denied 939 So.2d 93 (Fla.2006).

BARFIELD, ALLEN, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lundy v. FOUR SEASONS OCEAN GRAND PALM BCH.
932 So. 2d 506 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)
Buitrago v. Landry's
949 So. 2d 1046 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
963 So. 2d 308, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 12628, 2007 WL 2301284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-wal-mart-fladistctapp-2007.