Payne v. Superior Court

82 A.2d 167
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided July 20, 1951·No. M. P. No. 973·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

82 A.2d 167 (1951)

Mary Dexter PAYNE et al.
v.
The SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE COUNTY OF PROVIDENCE.

M. P. No. 973.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island.

July 20, 1951.

Everett D. Higgins, Harold E. Staples, Edwin H. Hastings, all of Providence, for petitioners.

William E. Powers, Atty. Gen., Robert A. Coogan, Asst. Atty. Gen., for the State.

William E. McCabe, City Sol., James J. Corrigan, Asst. City Sol., Providence, for City of Providence.

PER CURIAM.

After our decision in the above case the petitioners asked and received permission to file a motion for reargument. Pursuant to this permission they have filed such a motion, setting out therein certain reasons on which they base their contention that justice requires a reargument of the case. *168 We have carefully considered those reasons and we are of the opinion that they are without merit.

Motion denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. Superior Court, 82 A.2d 167 (R.I. 1951).

82 A.2d 167 (Payne v. Superior Court) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Richardson v. Smith
691 A.2d 543 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1997)
Leone v. Town of New Shoreham
534 A.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1987)
Taveira v. Solomon
528 A.2d 1105 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1987)
Goodman v. Turner
512 A.2d 861 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1986)
Salvadore v. Major Electric & Supply, Inc.
469 A.2d 353 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1983)
Sevigny v. City of Biddeford
344 A.2d 34 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1975)
Columbus Ornamental Iron Works, Inc. v. Martin
240 A.2d 405 (Supreme Court of Rhode Island, 1968)
Bailey v. Bailey
204 So. 2d 531 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1967)
Epperson v. Epperson
101 So. 2d 367 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1958)