Payne v. State

168 Tex. Crim. 285
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJune 24, 1959
DocketNo. 30,917
StatusPublished

This text of 168 Tex. Crim. 285 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. State, 168 Tex. Crim. 285 (Tex. 1959).

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Judge.

This is a conviction for the unlawful sale of whisky in a dry area; the punishment, a fine of $1,000 and one year in jail.

The statement of facts accompanying this record does not appear to have been approved either by counsel for the state or by the trial court. The sole approval is by counsel for the appellant.

Under such circumstances, the statement of facts is not subject to consideration by this court, Baird v. State, 162 Texas Cr. Rep. 589, 288 S.W. 2d 67.

The state’s motion to strike the statment of facts is granted.

There being nothing which can be considered in the absence of a statement of facts, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Baird v. State
288 S.W.2d 67 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 Tex. Crim. 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-texcrimapp-1959.