Payne v. State

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Payne v. State

144 A.D.3d 1490, 41 N.Y.S.3d 615

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 10, 2016

DocketClaim No. 115204

StatusPublished

This text of 144 A.D.3d 1490 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Payne v. State, 144 A.D.3d 1490, 41 N.Y.S.3d 615 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

[1491]*1491Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Renee Forgensi Minarik, J.), dated February 13, 2015. The judgment dismissed the claim after a trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant, an inmate at a correctional facility, commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell on a puddle of water in the hallway outside of his housing unit. We reject claimant’s contention that the determination of the Court of Claims dismissing the claim following a trial is against the weight of the evidence. “ ‘While it is well settled that this Court has the authority to independently consider the weight of the evidence on an appeal in a nonjury case, deference is still afforded to the findings of the Court of Claims where, as here, they are based largely on credibility determinations’ ” (Janczylik v State of New York, 126 AD3d 1485, 1485 [2015]). Here, the court credited the testimony and evidence presented at trial establishing that correction officers obtained notice of the condition only 15 minutes prior to the incident and were waiting for a housing porter to arrive and clean the area when claimant fell. The court’s determination that the 15-minute delay in removing the water was not unreasonable under the circumstances is not against the weight of the evidence (see Diaz v State of New York, 256 AD2d 1010, 1010 [1998]).

Present—Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Carni, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[1491]*1491Appeal from a judgment of the Court of Claims (Renee Forgensi Minarik, J.), dated February 13, 2015. The judgment dismissed the claim after a trial.

It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs.

Memorandum: Claimant, an inmate at a correctional facility, commenced this action seeking damages for injuries he sustained when he slipped and fell on a puddle of water in the hallway outside of his housing unit. We reject claimant’s contention that the determination of the Court of Claims dismissing the claim following a trial is against the weight of the evidence. “ ‘While it is well settled that this Court has the authority to independently consider the weight of the evidence on an appeal in a nonjury case, deference is still afforded to the findings of the Court of Claims where, as here, they are based largely on credibility determinations’ ” (Janczylik v State of New York, 126 AD3d 1485, 1485 [2015]). Here, the court credited the testimony and evidence presented at trial establishing that correction officers obtained notice of the condition only 15 minutes prior to the incident and were waiting for a housing porter to arrive and clean the area when claimant fell. The court’s determination that the 15-minute delay in removing the water was not unreasonable under the circumstances is not against the weight of the evidence (see Diaz v State of New York, 256 AD2d 1010, 1010 [1998]).

Present—Whalen, P.J., Smith, Centra, Peradotto and Carni, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 A.D.3d 1490, 41 N.Y.S.3d 615, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-nyappdiv-2016.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack