Payne v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Payne v. State

362 S.W.3d 509, 2012 WL 1032971, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 408

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 27, 2012

DocketED 96429

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 362 S.W.3d 509 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Payne v. State, 362 S.W.3d 509, 2012 WL 1032971, 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 408 (Mo. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Payne (Movant) appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis denying his amended Rule 24.035 motion without an evidentiary hearing. Movant claims that the motion court clearly erred in denying his claim that he received ineffective assistance of counsel because: (1) he was not advised of the range of punishment for the crimes charged; and (2) he was not provided with adequate notice of his probation violations. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find that the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI