Payne v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Payne v. State

233 S.W.3d 743, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 2007 WL 2702181

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 18, 2007·No. WD 67490·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carey L. Payne appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Payne claims ineffective assistance of counsel in that trial counsel coerced Payne into pleading guilty by stating Payne would receive a sentence of seven to ten years. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years. In that the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Carey L. Payne appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. Payne claims ineffective assistance of counsel in that trial counsel coerced Payne into pleading guilty by stating Payne would receive a sentence of seven to ten years. The court sentenced him as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years. In that the trial court’s decision was not clearly erroneous, the judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Payne v. State, 233 S.W.3d 743, 2007 Mo. App. LEXIS 1272, 2007 WL 2702181 (Mo. Ct. App. 2007).

Pincite

233 S.W.3d 743 (Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.