Payne v. State
857 S.W.2d 473, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 1993 WL 199136
This text of 857 S.W.2d 473 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Payne v. State, 857 S.W.2d 473, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 1993 WL 199136 (Mo. Ct. App. 1993).
Opinion
ORDER
We find the motion court did not clearly err in denying Defendant’s Rule 27.26 (repealed) motion for post-conviction relief. Rule 27.26(j). We further find an opinion would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued for the parties’ use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
857 S.W.2d 473, 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 877, 1993 WL 199136, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-moctapp-1993.