Payne v. State
Opinion
Defendant was convicted of armed robbery, kidnapping, burglary, and aggravated assault (two counts). He was sentenced to serve a life sentence for armed robbery and concurrent 10 year [434]*434sentences for the other crimes. A motion for new trial was filed, heard and denied. Defendant appeals. Held:
It appears that neither an enumeration of errors nor brief has been filed in this case in accordance with Rule 14 (Code Ann. § 24-3614) of this court after due notice by our order dated December 4, 1981, directing that an enumeration of errors and brief be filed not later than 4:30 p.m., December 9,1981, or the appeal would be subject to dismissal under Rule 27 (a) (Code Ann. § 24-3627 (a)) and Rule 14 of this court.
Nevertheless, we have examined the record and transcript and found no errors prejudicial to the defendant’s rights. A rational trier of fact (the jury in the case sub judice) could reasonably have found from the evidence adduced at trial proof of the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt of the offenses charged in the indictment. Drake v. State, 245 Ga. 798, 799 (267 SE2d 237); Sanders v. State, 246 Ga. 42 (1) (268 SE2d 628).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
288 S.E.2d 351 (Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.