Payne v. State
812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4483, 2002 WL 507021
This text of 812 So. 2d 600 (Payne v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Payne v. State, 812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4483, 2002 WL 507021 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
Opinion
We treat this appeal as a petition for belated appeal of the denial of Payne’s rule 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. On the merits, we affirm. See Priest v. State, 603 So.2d 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (when probation is revoked, no credit is given for time spent on probation).
PETITION GRANTED; AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Priest v. State
603 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4483, 2002 WL 507021, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.