Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Payne v. State

Payne v. State

812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4483, 2002 WL 507021
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 5, 2002·No. No. 5D02-594·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We treat this appeal as a petition for belated appeal of the denial of Payne’s rule 3.800(a) Motion to Correct Illegal Sentence. On the merits, we affirm. See Priest v. State, 603 So.2d 141 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992) (when probation is revoked, no credit is given for time spent on probation).

PETITION GRANTED; AFFIRMED.

COBB, PLEUS and ORFINGER, R. B., JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. State, 812 So. 2d 600, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 4483, 2002 WL 507021 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

812 So. 2d 600 (Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Priest v. State
603 So. 2d 141 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1992)