Payne v. State
498 So. 2d 413, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 589, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2825
Opinions
This is a petition to review Payne v. State, 480 So.2d 202 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), in which the district court held that the trial court did not err in considering Payne’s habitual offender status as a reason for departure from sentencing guidelines. We find conflict with Whitehead v. State, 498 [414]*414So.2d 863 (Fla.1986).
It is so ordered.
We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Payne v. State, 498 So. 2d 413, 11 Fla. L. Weekly 589, 1986 Fla. LEXIS 2825 (Fla. 1986).
498 So. 2d 413 (Payne v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Harrell v. State
721 So. 2d 1185 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1998)
Everage v. State
516 So. 2d 81 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Hall v. State
511 So. 2d 1038 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)
Vicknair v. State
501 So. 2d 755 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)