Payne v. Social Security Administration

Fourth Circuit

Payne v. Social Security Administration

515 F. App'x 236

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 29, 2013

DocketNo. 13-1079

StatusPublished

This text of 515 F. App'x 236 (Payne v. Social Security Administration) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Payne v. Social Security Administration, 515 F. App'x 236 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dorian Jeffery Payne appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied his application for benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Payne’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Payne has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dorian Jeffery Payne appeals the district court’s order dismissing as untimely his complaint seeking judicial review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, which denied his application for benefits. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Payne’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Payne has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

515 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-social-security-administration-ca4-2013.