Payne v. Roche

41 Fla. 478
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided June 15, 1899·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam :

It appearing to< the court that the writ of error in this cause was issued on a day of the January term, A. D. 1893, of this court and made returnable tO' a day in said [479] term in violation of the statute (Section 1270, Revised Statutes,), and the court is without jurisdiction of the subject-matter (Fleming v. Fleming, 40 Fla. 154, 23 South. Rep. 571; Browning v. State, 40 Fla. 466, 25 South. Rep. 62; Simmons v. State, 40 Fla. 467, 25 South. Rep. 62; Savannah, Florida & Western Ry. Co. v. Justice, 41 Fla. —, 26 South. Rep. 704), it is, therefore, ordered that said cause be stricken from the docket and the writ dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. Roche, 41 Fla. 478 (Fla. 1899).

41 Fla. 478 (Payne v. Roche) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McJunkins v. Stevens
102 So. 756 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1925)
Gadsden v. State
80 So. 308 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1918)
Barnett v. Hickson
48 Fla. 68 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1904)
Bishop v. I. L. Lyons & Co.
43 Fla. 445 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1901)