Payne v. Powell
This text of 14 Tex. 600 (Payne v. Powell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The agreement, set up in the answer, as an agreement to give further time to the principal debtor, whereby the sureties are discharged from their liability, being an agreement to pay, for the use of money loaned, a larger premium,-or rate of interest, than is allowed by law, was usurious and void. (Hart. Dig. Art. 1609; 1 Wend. R. 555; 6 Id. 415.)
It is well settled, that the. mere giving of time to the principal debtor, without a binding agreement to that effect, will not discharge the surety. (Burke v. Cruger, 8 Tex. R. 66; Cruger v. Burke, 11 Id. 694.) And it seems equally well settled, that an executory contract, or promise to pay usurious, interest, not being obligatory on the principal, and the agreement to give time, consequently, being without consideration and void, such an agreement will not discharge the surety. (7 B. Monroe, 218; 6 Id. 287; 3 Id. 262; 1 Id. 322, 325.) [602]*602We are of opinion, therefore, that the Court did not err in sustaining exceptions to the plea setting up this defence. The judgment is affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 Tex. 600, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-powell-tex-1855.