Payne v. Peninsula School
This text of Payne v. Peninsula School (Payne v. Peninsula School) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
WINDY PAYNE, individually and as guardian on behalf of; D.P., a minor child, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. No. 07-35115 PENINSULA SCHOOL DISTRICT, a municipal corporation; ARTONDALE D.C. No. CV-05-05780-RBL ELEMENTARY SCHOOL, a municipal corporation; JODI COY, in her ORDER individual and official capacity; JAMES COOLICAN, in his individual and official capacity; JANE DOES 1- 10; JOHN DOES 1-10, Defendants-Appellees. Filed September 7, 2010
ORDER
KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:
Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Payne v. Peninsula School, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-peninsula-school-ca9-2010.