Payne v. Merced County Public Defender's Office

District Court, E.D. California·Decided March 6, 2024·No. 1:22-cv-00157·Unknown

Opinion

1 LIVE OAK LAW OFFICE LLP Whitney, Thompson & Jeffcoach LLP Robyn Fass Wang (SBN 194006) Mandy L. Jeffcoach, #232313 2 Pilar R. Stillwater (SBN 260467) mjeffcoach@wtjlaw.com 1442A Walnut Street #229 Devon R. McTeer, #230539 3 Berkeley, California 94709 dmcteer@wtjlaw.com Telephone: 510.637.9349 970 W. Alluvial Ave. 4 robynfasswang@gmail.com Fresno, California 93711 pilarstillwater@gmail.com Telephone: (559) 753-2550 5 Facsimile: (559) 753-2560 Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 JACOB PAYNE Attorneys for THOMAS PFEIFF AND CINDY MORSE 7 Forrest W. Hansen, SBN 235432 8 Merced County Counsel Jenna M. Anderson, SBN 291467 9 Chief Deputy County Counsel 10 Mark T. Laluan, SBN 339479 Deputy County Counsel 11 2222 M Street Merced, CA 95340 12 Tel: (209) 385-7564 Fax: (209) 726-1337 13 Jenna.Anderson@countyofmerced.com 14 Mark.Laluan@countyofmerced.com Attorneys for Defendants COUNTY OF 15 MERCED, KATHLEEN CROOKHAM, DEIDRE F. KELSEY, JOHN PEDROZO, 16 and HUBERT WALSH JR.

17 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 18 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 19 MERCED DIVISION 20 21 JACOB PAYNE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00157-BAM 22 Plaintiff, [PROPOSED] STIPULATED 23 PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 24 COUNTY OF MERCED, et al., 25 Defendants. 26

28 1 PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 2 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 3 confidential, proprietary, or private information for which special protection from public disclosure 4 and from use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, 5 the parties hereby stipulate to and petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective 6 Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket protections on all 7 disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords from public disclosure and 8 use extends only to the limited information or items that are entitled to confidential treatment under 9 the applicable legal principles. The parties further acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, 10 that this Stipulated Protective Order does not entitle them to file confidential information under 11 seal; Civil Local Rules 141 (sealing) and 140 (redaction) set forth the procedures that must be 12 followed and the standards that will be applied when a party seeks permission from the court to file 13 material under seal. 14 2. DEFINITIONS 15 2.1 Challenging Party: a Party or Non-Party that challenges the designation of 16 information or items under this Order. 17 2.2 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how it is 18 generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under Federal Rule of 19 Civil Procedure 26(c). 20 2.3 Counsel (without qualifier): Outside Counsel of Record and House Counsel (as well 21 as their support staff). 22 2.4 Designating Party: a Party or Non-Party that designates information or items that it 23 produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 24 2.5 Disclosure or Discovery Material: all items or information, regardless of the medium 25 or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among other things, testimony, 26 transcripts, and tangible things), that are produced or generated in disclosures or responses to 27 discovery in this matter. 28 2.6 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter pertinent to 1 the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an expert witness or as a 2 consultant in this action. 3 2.7 House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this action. House 4 Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 5 2.8 Non-Party: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other legal 6 entity not named as a Party to this action. 7 2.9 Outside Counsel of Record: attorneys who are not employees of a party to this action 8 but are retained to represent or advise a party to this action and have appeared in this action on 9 behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has appeared on behalf of that party. 10 2.10 Party: any party to this action, including all of its officers, directors, employees, 11 consultants, retained experts, and Outside Counsel of Record (and their support staffs). 12 2.11 Producing Party: a Party or Non-Party that produces Disclosure or Discovery 13 Material in this action. 14 2.12 Professional Vendors: persons or entities that provide litigation support services 15 (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or demonstrations, and organizing, 16 storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and their employees and subcontractors. 17 2.13 Protected Material: any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is designated as 18 “CONFIDENTIAL.” 19 2.14 Receiving Party: a Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material from a 20 Producing Party. 21 3. SCOPE 22 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only Protected Material 23 (as defined above), but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected Material; (2) all 24 copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and (3) any testimony, 25 conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might reveal Protected Material. 26 However, the protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order do not cover the following 27 information: (a) any information that is in the public domain at the time of disclosure to a Receiving 28 Party or becomes part of the public domain after its disclosure to a Receiving Party as a result of 1 publication not involving a violation of this Order, including becoming part of the public record 2 through trial or otherwise; and (b) any information known to the Receiving Party prior to the 3 disclosure or obtained by the Receiving Party after the disclosure from a source who obtained the 4 information lawfully and under no obligation of confidentiality to the Designating Party. Any use of 5 Protected Material at trial shall be governed by a separate agreement or order. 6 4. DURATION 7 Even after final disposition of this litigation, the confidentiality obligations imposed by this 8 Order shall remain in effect until a Designating Party agrees otherwise in writing or a court order 9 otherwise directs. Final disposition shall be deemed to be the later of (1) dismissal of all claims and 10 defenses in this action, with or without prejudice; and (2) final judgment herein after the completion 11 and exhaustion of all appeals, rehearings, remands, trials, or reviews of this action, including the 12 time limits for filing any motions or applications for extension of time pursuant to applicable law. 13 5. DESIGNATING PROTECTED MATERIAL 14 5.1 Exercise of Restraint and Care in Designating Material for Protection. Each Party or 15 Non-Party that designates information or items for protection under this Order must take care to 16 limit any such designation to specific material that qualifies under the appropriate standards. The 17 Designating Party must designate for protection only those parts of material, documents, items, or 18 oral or written communications that qualify – so that other portions of the material, documents, 19 items, or communications for which protection is not warranted are not swept unjustifiably within 20 the ambit of this Order. 21 Mass, indiscriminate, or routinized designations are prohibited. Designations that are shown 22 to be clearly unjustified or that have been made for an improper purpose (e.g., to unnecessarily 23 encumber or retard the case development process or to impose unnecessary expenses and burdens 24 on other parties) expose the Designating Party to sanctions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. Merced County Public Defender's Office, (E.D. Cal. 2024).

Payne v. Merced County Public Defender's Office (Payne v. Merced County Public Defender's Office) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pintos v. PACIFIC CREDITORS ASS'N
605 F.3d 665 (Ninth Circuit, 2010)