Payne v. Lee

676 F. App'x 217
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 21, 2017·No. No. 16-2100·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Robert Thomas Payne appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Payne v. Lee, No. 1:15-cv-01268-CMH-IDD, 2016 WL 4009820 (E.D. Va. July 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. Lee, 676 F. App'x 217 (4th Cir. 2017).

676 F. App'x 217 (Payne v. Lee) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related