Payne v. Jones

Supreme Court of Georgia

Payne v. Jones

91 S.E.2d 352, 212 Ga. 216, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 320

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Payne v. Jones. Read the opinion of the Court — 211 Ga. 322 →

Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided January 9, 1956·No. 19116·Published

Opinion

Head, Justice.

1. The rulings of this court on the former appearance of the present case, whether right or wrong, have become the law of the case.

2. The amendment filed subsequently to the former judgment is insufficient to meet the deficiency in the defendant’s pleadings under the former rulings in the cause, and the court did not err in striking the answer on motion, or in thereafter directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Head, Justice.

1. The rulings of this court on the former appearance of the present case, whether right or wrong, have become the law of the case.

2. The amendment filed subsequently to the former judgment is insufficient to meet the deficiency in the defendant’s pleadings under the former rulings in the cause, and the court did not err in striking the answer on motion, or in thereafter directing a verdict for the plaintiff.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur.

Payne v. Jones, 91 S.E.2d 352, 212 Ga. 216, 1956 Ga. LEXIS 320 (Ga. 1956).

Pincite

91 S.E.2d 352 (Payne v. Jones) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.