Payne v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission

380 So. 2d 479, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23606
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1980
DocketNo. TT-287
StatusPublished

This text of 380 So. 2d 479 (Payne v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. Florida Parole & Probation Commission, 380 So. 2d 479, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23606 (Fla. Ct. App. 1980).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This cause is before us on Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus asserting failure of respondents to properly compute a presumptive release date. Factual matters are asserted, and no record is provided. Petitioner has failed to exhaust administrative remedies. Houston v. Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 377 So.2d 34 (Fla.1st DCA 1979); Anderson v. Florida Probation and Parole Commission, 378 So.2d 861 (Fla.1st DCA 1979). The petition is denied.

MILLS, C. J., and SHAW and WENT-WORTH, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Houston v. FLA. PAROLE & PROBATION COMM.
377 So. 2d 34 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)
Anderson v. Florida Probation & Parole Commission
378 So. 2d 861 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
380 So. 2d 479, 1980 Fla. App. LEXIS 23606, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-florida-parole-probation-commission-fladistctapp-1980.