Payne v. Evans

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Payne v. Evans

29 A.D.2d 827, 287 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4679

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1968

StatusPublished

This text of 29 A.D.2d 827 (Payne v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Payne v. Evans, 29 A.D.2d 827, 287 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4679 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The defendant-appellant died August 13, 1967 and Beth T. Evans was appointed administratrix of her estate December 12, 1967. Thereafter the administratrix was duly substituted as a party in the place and stead of the deceased. It was conceded upon the argument of the appeal, and the concession is supported by an examination of the transcript in the appendix, that the examination of the defendant before trial does not establish the respondent’s position factually. Further it appears that the transcript of the examination before trial which the Special Term Justice states he gave consideration to in his order for summary judgment was not included in the motion papers submitted to the Justice on the argument of the motion. Excluding the examination before trial from consideration and on all the papers properly .before the court, no adequate showing was made to warrant the order for summary judgment. (Appeal from judgment and order of Oneida Special Term granting in part plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order unanimously reversed, without costs, and motion denied. Memorandum: The defendant-appellant died August 13, 1967 and Beth T. Evans was appointed administratrix of her estate December 12, 1967. Thereafter the administratrix was duly substituted as a party in the place and stead of the deceased. It was conceded upon the argument of the appeal, and the concession is supported by an examination of the transcript in the appendix, that the examination of the defendant before trial does not establish the respondent’s position factually. Further it appears that the transcript of the examination before trial which the Special Term Justice states he gave consideration to in his order for summary judgment was not included in the motion papers submitted to the Justice on the argument of the motion. Excluding the examination before trial from consideration and on all the papers properly .before the court, no adequate showing was made to warrant the order for summary judgment. (Appeal from judgment and order of Oneida Special Term granting in part plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment.) Present — Williams, P. J., Bastow, Goldman, Henry and Marsh, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 A.D.2d 827, 287 N.Y.S.2d 532, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-evans-nyappdiv-1968.