Payne v. District of Columbia
This text of 253 F.2d 867 (Payne v. District of Columbia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant sued for damages and for injunctive and declarative relief to require appellees to permit conjugal visits to her husband and private accommodations during the time he is lawfully committed to the District of Columbia Jail under a conviction for housebreaking. His incarceration is not challenged. She claims she has been denied rights without due process as to her.
The District Court dismissed the complaint of appellant for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.
We find no error in the dismissal and the judgment of the District Court is therefore
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
253 F.2d 867, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-district-of-columbia-cadc-1958.