Payne v. District of Columbia

253 F.2d 867, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 345
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided March 27, 1958·No. No. 13944·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant sued for damages and for injunctive and declarative relief to require appellees to permit conjugal visits to her husband and private accommodations during the time he is lawfully committed to the District of Columbia Jail under a conviction for housebreaking. His incarceration is not challenged. She claims she has been denied rights without due process as to her.

The District Court dismissed the complaint of appellant for failure to state a claim upon which relief could be granted.

We find no error in the dismissal and the judgment of the District Court is therefore

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. District of Columbia, 253 F.2d 867, 102 U.S. App. D.C. 345 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

253 F.2d 867 (Payne v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

William Gerber v. Rodney Hickman, Warden
291 F.3d 617 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)
McCray v. Sullivan
509 F.2d 1332 (Fifth Circuit, 1975)
Lyons v. Gilligan
382 F. Supp. 198 (N.D. Ohio, 1974)
Polakoff v. Henderson
370 F. Supp. 690 (N.D. Georgia, 1973)
Stuart v. Heard
359 F. Supp. 921 (S.D. Texas, 1973)
Benny Lurk v. United States
296 F.2d 360 (D.C. Circuit, 1961)