Payne v. Dirton-Hill

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: March 3, 2009
• Docket: 08-2389
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-2389

MARCUS S. PAYNE,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

and

ERIC C. PAYNE,

Plaintiff,

v.

DOROTHY DIRTON-HILL; BROADUS F. JONES; DAISY E. JONES; FLETCHER ANDERSON; ADALYNN C. PAYNE, a/k/a Adalynn C. Joyner; JOHN DOE,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (6:08-cv-01924-GRA)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 3, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Marcus S. Payne, Appellant Pro Se. Dorothy Dirton-Hill; Broadus F. Jones; Daisy E. Jones; Adalynn C. Payne, Appellees Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Marcus S. Payne appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and

dismissing his complaint without prejudice for lack of subject

matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no

reversible error. Accordingly, we deny Payne’s motions to

supplement the record and for equal consideration and affirm for

the reasons stated by the district court. Payne v. Dirton-Hill,

No. 6:08-cv-01924-GRA (D.S.C. Dec. 3, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED