Payne v. City of New York
This text of 230 A.D. 734 (Payne v. City of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to strike out matter alleged as a separate defense in paragraph 6 of answer reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. -The plaintiff was entitled to rent from the defendant after September, 1911, for the part of the demised premises not acquired by the defendant by condemnation, and the defendant, having paid plaintiff a rental of $850 a year continuously from 1911 to 1926, is to be deemed to have ratified and adopted the apportionment and adjustment made by its deputy comptroller with the plaintiff in 1911 under which such payments were made. Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
230 A.D. 734, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-city-of-new-york-nyappdiv-1930.