Payne v. City of New York

230 A.D. 734
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided June 15, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Order denying motion to strike out matter alleged as a separate defense in paragraph 6 of answer reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. -The plaintiff was entitled to rent from the defendant after September, 1911, for the part of the demised premises not acquired by the defendant by condemnation, and the defendant, having paid plaintiff a rental of $850 a year continuously from 1911 to 1926, is to be deemed to have ratified and adopted the apportionment and adjustment made by its deputy comptroller with the plaintiff in 1911 under which such payments were made. Young, Kapper, Seudder and Tompkins, JJ., concur; Lazansky, P. J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. City of New York, 230 A.D. 734 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1930).

230 A.D. 734 (Payne v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payne v. City of New York
234 A.D. 798 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1931)