Payne v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.

69 Ill. App. 38, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 257
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedMarch 8, 1897
StatusPublished

This text of 69 Ill. App. 38 (Payne v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 69 Ill. App. 38, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 257 (Ill. Ct. App. 1897).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Waterman

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The judgment of the Circuit Court discharging the garnishees must be affirmed, if for no other reason, because the record fails to show any evidence that the garnishees were indebted in any sum to the principal defendant, Lee.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
69 Ill. App. 38, 1896 Ill. App. LEXIS 257, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-chicago-r-i-p-ry-co-illappct-1897.