Payne v. Carolina Power & Light Co.

205 N.C. 32
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 28, 1933
StatusPublished

This text of 205 N.C. 32 (Payne v. Carolina Power & Light Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. Carolina Power & Light Co., 205 N.C. 32 (N.C. 1933).

Opinion

Beoqden, J.

As the plaintiff starts down the stairs of her home for supper, the lights go out. She reaches the side of the stairway and immediately becomes aware of the fact that none of the lights in the house are burning. Notwithstanding she undertakes to go down stairs in the dark, misses her step, falls and is injured. She said: “The reason I fell was because I thought I was on the bottom when really I wasn’t.” The plaintiff relies upon res ipsa loquitur to make out a case. This principle has no application “when all the facts causing the accident are known and testified to by the witness at the trial.” Springs v. Doll, 197 N. C., 240, 148 S. E., 251. Consequently the judgment is correct.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Springs v. . Doll
148 S.E. 251 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
205 N.C. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-carolina-power-light-co-nc-1933.