Payne v. Allen

116 S.E. 642, 30 Ga. App. 80, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 262
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Payne v. Allen. Read the opinion of the Court — 28 Ga. App. 8
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided March 17, 1923·No. 12498·Published

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

It appearing, from tlie remittitur and tlie opinion of the Supreme Court, that the judgment of this court rendered in this case (see Payne v. Allen, 28 Ga. App. 8, 110 S. E. 345), has been reversed, the former judgment of this court is vacated, and, in accordance with tlie ruling of the Supreme Court, the judgment of the court below is reversed because the court erred in not sustaining the special de[81]*81murrer to paragraph 7 of the plaintiff’s petition. Payne v. Allen, 155 Ga. 54 (116 S. E. 640).

Decided March 17, 1923. Ilartsfield & Conger, Pope & Bennet, for plaintiff in error. B. L. Berner, IF. M. Harrell, ■John B. Wilson, contra:

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne v. Allen, 116 S.E. 642, 30 Ga. App. 80, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

116 S.E. 642 (Payne v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Payne v. Allen
116 S.E. 640 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Payne v. Allen
110 S.E. 345 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)