Payne v. Allen

116 S.E. 642, 30 Ga. App. 80, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 262
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 17, 1923
Docket12498
StatusPublished

This text of 116 S.E. 642 (Payne v. Allen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Payne v. Allen, 116 S.E. 642, 30 Ga. App. 80, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 262 (Ga. Ct. App. 1923).

Opinion

Jenkins, P. J.

It appearing, from tlie remittitur and tlie opinion of the Supreme Court, that the judgment of this court rendered in this case (see Payne v. Allen, 28 Ga. App. 8, 110 S. E. 345), has been reversed, the former judgment of this court is vacated, and, in accordance with tlie ruling of the Supreme Court, the judgment of the court below is reversed because the court erred in not sustaining the special de[81]*81murrer to paragraph 7 of the plaintiff’s petition. Payne v. Allen, 155 Ga. 54 (116 S. E. 640).

Decided March 17, 1923. Ilartsfield & Conger, Pope & Bennet, for plaintiff in error. B. L. Berner, IF. M. Harrell, ■John B. Wilson, contra:

Judgment reversed.

Stephens and Bell, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Payne v. Allen
116 S.E. 640 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1923)
Payne v. Allen
110 S.E. 345 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1921)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
116 S.E. 642, 30 Ga. App. 80, 1923 Ga. App. LEXIS 262, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-v-allen-gactapp-1923.