Payne, Jason Thad
This text of Payne, Jason Thad (Payne, Jason Thad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. PD–1214–11
JASON THAD PAYNE, Appellant
v.
THE STATE OF TEXAS
ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS WOOD COUNTY
M EYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.
DISSENTING OPINION
The majority reverses after concluding that the court of appeals erred in
determining that the admission of several erroneously admitted victim statements was
harmless. I disagree with this conclusion. After examining the court of appeals opinion, I
agree that the admission of the statements was harmless error, and feel that the analysis
conducted by the court of appeals is more accurate than the analysis conducted by the Payne Dissent–Page 2
majority. There is no way a rational trier of fact would have reached a different result had
the error not occurred.1
With these comments, I respectfully dissent.
Meyers, J.
Filed: February 27, 2013 Do Not Publish
1 Tillman v. State, 376 S.W.3d 188 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2012]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Payne, Jason Thad, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payne-jason-thad-texcrimapp-2013.