Payne, Jason Thad

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided February 27, 2013·No. PD-1214-11·Published

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS

NO. PD–1214–11

JASON THAD PAYNE, Appellant v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS

ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW FROM THE TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS WOOD COUNTY

M EYERS, J., filed a dissenting opinion.

DISSENTING OPINION

The majority reverses after concluding that the court of appeals erred in determining that the admission of several erroneously admitted victim statements was harmless. I disagree with this conclusion. After examining the court of appeals opinion, I agree that the admission of the statements was harmless error, and feel that the analysis conducted by the court of appeals is more accurate than the analysis conducted by the

Payne Dissent–Page 2

majority. There is no way a rational trier of fact would have reached a different result had the error not occurred.1 With these comments, I respectfully dissent.

Meyers, J.

Filed: February 27, 2013 Do Not Publish

1 Tillman v. State, 376 S.W.3d 188 (Tex. App.–Houston [14th Dist.] 2012]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Payne, Jason Thad, (Tex. 2013).

Payne, Jason Thad (Payne, Jason Thad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Larry Joseph Tillman Jr. v. State
376 S.W.3d 188 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2012)