Payn v. Parks
1 How. Pr. 94
This text of 1 How. Pr. 94 (Payn v. Parks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Payn v. Parks, 1 How. Pr. 94 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1845).
Opinion
Held, that Forkson had a right to defend in the name of the tenant, and that the settlement with the tenant operated as a fraud upon the attorney.
Decision.—Motion granted with costs.
The same decision in the cases of Payn vs. Simmons, and Payn vs. Beal.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 How. Pr. 94, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/payn-v-parks-nysupct-1845.