Paxton v. Sanderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Paxton v. Sanderson

763 So. 2d 638, 2000 La. App. LEXIS 1770, 2000 WL 968117

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Paxton v. Sanderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 La. App. LEXIS 3479 →

Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided July 12, 2000·No. No. 32,313-CA·Published

Opinion

BROWN, J.

This case is back before us on remand from the supreme court, which found that an exclusion which it previously held to be ambiguous was nonetheless clear under the particular facts involved in this case. See Paxton v. Sanderson, 00-0587 (La.04/28/00), 761 So.2d 503.

For the reasons set forth in Judge Gas-kins’ original dissent, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, J.

This case is back before us on remand from the supreme court, which found that an exclusion which it previously held to be ambiguous was nonetheless clear under the particular facts involved in this case. See Paxton v. Sanderson, 00-0587 (La.04/28/00), 761 So.2d 503.

For the reasons set forth in Judge Gas-kins’ original dissent, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims.

Paxton v. Sanderson, 763 So. 2d 638, 2000 La. App. LEXIS 1770, 2000 WL 968117 (La. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

763 So. 2d 638 (Paxton v. Sanderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related