Paxton v. Sanderson

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Paxton v. Sanderson

763 So. 2d 638, 2000 La. App. LEXIS 1770, 2000 WL 968117

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJuly 12, 2000

DocketNo. 32,313-CA

StatusPublished

This text of 763 So. 2d 638 (Paxton v. Sanderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Paxton v. Sanderson, 763 So. 2d 638, 2000 La. App. LEXIS 1770, 2000 WL 968117 (La. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, J.

This case is back before us on remand from the supreme court, which found that an exclusion which it previously held to be ambiguous was nonetheless clear under the particular facts involved in this case. See Paxton v. Sanderson, 00-0587 (La.04/28/00), 761 So.2d 503.

For the reasons set forth in Judge Gas-kins’ original dissent, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, J.

This case is back before us on remand from the supreme court, which found that an exclusion which it previously held to be ambiguous was nonetheless clear under the particular facts involved in this case. See Paxton v. Sanderson, 00-0587 (La.04/28/00), 761 So.2d 503.

For the reasons set forth in Judge Gas-kins’ original dissent, we affirm the judgment of the trial court granting summary judgment and dismissing plaintiffs’ claims.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

763 So. 2d 638, 2000 La. App. LEXIS 1770, 2000 WL 968117, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paxton-v-sanderson-lactapp-2000.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack