Paxton v. Paxton

108 S.W.3d 778, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1043, 2003 WL 21488151
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 30, 2003
DocketNo. WD 61529
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 108 S.W.3d 778 (Paxton v. Paxton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Paxton v. Paxton, 108 S.W.3d 778, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1043, 2003 WL 21488151 (Mo. Ct. App. 2003).

Opinion

ORDER

The present appeal arises out of an action brought by respondent Earl S. Paxton (“Father”1) against appellant Earl D. Pax-ton (“Son”) regarding a parcel of real estate located in Sedalia, Missouri. Father contends that Son sold to him in May 1995, while Son argues that no sale took place and that he remained the owner of the property. Father brought suit against Son seeking the imposition of a constructive trust on the property and the invalidation of a warranty deed Son recorded that purported to transfer the property in his name. The trial court granted the requested relief, and Son appeals that judgment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal, and find no error of law. A written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no prec-edential or jurisprudential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Fisher v. Shults
242 S.W.3d 371 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2007)
Travis v. Travis
174 S.W.3d 67 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2005)
Sherman v. Sherman
160 S.W.3d 381 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
108 S.W.3d 778, 2003 Mo. App. LEXIS 1043, 2003 WL 21488151, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/paxton-v-paxton-moctapp-2003.